🔗 Share this article

As the beleaguered Conservative party meets in its conference city for its yearly gathering, it has a lot to reflect on regarding its future direction. It’s not even clear if a viable path exists at all. We are in challenging circumstances for a political party that now has almost nothing, if anything, fresh or distinctive to say to the electorate.

The Missed Opportunity

The situation might have been vastly better if real advances had been made on an agenda that matters to people throughout the UK: Levelling up. However the former leadership hadn’t got the basic understanding on how to turn the trendy talk on levelling up into policy reality. During the initial period after the 2019 election, it argued over what the concept truly represented.

It seemed strange to me, because I had previously explained to Johnson what social mobility entailed when we initially discussed about it during the contest for party leader. This terminology was language I created and used at the education ministry to talk about equal opportunity. It served as our departmental mantra, and its purpose is straightforward: social mobility is the approach by which we realize fair chances – not by taking chances away from those who possess it, but rather by providing options to those that are without.

Fundamental Idea

An additional vital education department term we used, “ability is distributed uniformly throughout the nation, but opportunity is not”, served as a intentional wording, representing the two halves of a fairness agenda. First, potential shared equally but not nurtured uniformly through our schools and colleges. Second, opportunities not spread evenly by businesses or our market. Therefore, learning and employment were key to achieving better life chances. This was an agenda about the societal structure of our country – fostering individual capabilities and connecting them to prospects.

What Levelling Up Became

How did levelling up become under the previous government? Regional development money administered out of the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities. Street beautification and reconfigured roundabouts and roads. A white paper was published a significant period after the Prime Minister took office, which saw ongoing initiatives rebadged under the recently branded agenda.

Therefore, a comprehensive equal opportunity plan went undeveloped, as well as all the change that it might have driven – in capital, enterprise, economic policy, taxation and in community development. Additionally, in schooling, including a higher education sector that has become a punchbag for leaders across parties – despite the fact that it remains the primary vehicle of social mobility for young working-class people, personally, this country has had in recent decades. Possibly the sole mechanism of fair chances, functioning widely.

The Importance of Aspiration

Ambition is crucial for our country to succeed. For hope to exist, there needs to be a believable feeling that effort and reward are connected; that if people dream big, they can succeed. For any government, being able to foster a feeling of hope about the future is important. Analysis by the research body at Bath University and others, recently released, showed that the education department’s targeted regions I launched while in office – locally targeted strategies to enhancing learning results – led to young people in those neighborhoods being up to nearly one-fifth more hopeful about their future than those in similar areas without these schemes in place. The evidence is clear: just making an authentic start on equal chance initiatives can rapidly and effectively change how people view their future.

Squandered Chances

Ignoring this evidence, and in the midst of its new leader election, in that period, the ruling party terminated the programmes. Why should any person in those regions vote for a organization that did that? The opportunity areas policy is a single instance of what had the potential to be a transformative Tory policy platform on social mobility, but that chance was completely wasted. Methods such as this can generate optimism and ambition. In contrast, as the ruling party discovered, failing to deliver of social mobility is the most expensive error any leadership can make. The electorate punished the leadership for its failure but, above all, for its unfulfilled commitments on equal opportunity.

Today’s Political Reality

Now the baton on equal opportunity and equality of opportunity has been taken up by a Labour government. The previous terminology has been discarded. The current administration has its own policy language of “eliminating hurdles to advancement”. The organization that is steadily supplanting the struggling Tories, the challenger, also has its own message – “reindustrialisation”. The terminology to talk about fresh prospects in areas like the one I come from, in the region. It promises that an former economic strength can be reborn into an revitalized economy.

For voters, it must appear as a repetitive cycle. Identical problem, new terminology. Yet, currently, little improvement.

The Way Forward

Should the current and alternative parties want to avoid the identical outcome, both these parties should learn from the Tories’ mistakes on social mobility; that social mobility rhetoric is simple terminology, but successful delivery of improved opportunities is far more challenging. The UK’s endemically weak equal opportunity remains the primary challenge for our country, with young people unable to get a proper professional launch, those laboring in occupations with minimal progress after the housing costs are covered, and citizens throughout the UK without any actual expectation their next generation will be able to do any better in life than they have.

Elected officials can mention fairer opportunities repeatedly. However, which party has the organization that has the thorough strategy on life chances? None appear to exist. Whoever gets there first, prevails. Not only for themselves, but, significantly, for a whole country that has desperately requires equal access so badly.